Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Hipster Irony



I'd like to develop my thoughts on hipsterism a bit further. In my last essay I described an encounter with hipsters in which I found that some self-reflection allowed me to abandon my own insecurity and appreciate them for what they were. I even admitted to displaying a certain amount of hipster aesthetic. I'm not a hipster myself, though. One stark difference between us remains: they value irony more than sincerity. I don't.

We live in an ironic age, we are told. One aspect of modern irony is self-deprecation. We make fun of ourselves. Why? According to Christy Wampole (How to Live Without Irony) we do so to preempt criticism. We do it out of fear.

"Take, for example, an ad that calls itself an ad, makes fun of its own format, and attempts to lure its target market to laugh at and with it. It pre-emptively acknowledges its own failure to accomplish anything meaningful. No attack can be set against it, as it has already conquered itself. The ironic frame functions as a shield against criticism. The same goes for ironic living. Irony is the most self-defensive mode, as it allows a person to dodge responsibility for his or her choices, aesthetic and otherwise. To live ironicly is to hide in public."

I think that there's something to this. We insult ourselves before other people can. If we produce something sincere on a social media platform and people mock us it stings because they are mocking who we are. If we present ourselves as clownish figures, though, we preempt their mockery with our own. We are in on the joke. It's safer. We risk less. Isn't this a species of cowardice? 

Wampole's essay is excellent, and I think that she is right to be suspicious of irony, but she misses a very important aspect of hipster culture: authenticity.

One of the great hallmarks of hipster culture is the rejection of consumerism. Hipsters shun the cheap and instant. Why do hipsters spend $200 on jeans made from antique looms in Japan? Because those are the REAL thing. That's what jeans are supposed to be. People put effort into them. People cared about them. That smacks of... sincerity.

In her essay Wampole pokes fun at trombone playing hipsters. Fair enough; it seems a little odd, but let me tell you, anybody who gets decent at the trombone is sincere. They may laugh about it with their friends, they may play it off as a quirky hobby, but they are absolutely sincere. Learning an instrument takes discipline and commitment. There's no irony to be mined there. 

Why learn the trombone at all? So that you can pull it out, play something jaunty for twenty seconds and then have a laugh with your friends? No. Hipsters learn to play trombone because the trombone is real in a way that Rhianna is not. I've seen hipster brass bands playing on street corners; they mean it. Complement their playing and their eyes shine with pride. 

What I see in the hipster movement is a looking back to some of the things we've lost as a culture. We used to make things with our hands. We used to pay real money for real craftsmanship. Life was slower. Hipsters were raised in a fast-paced consumerist wonderland where everything is available on demand, instantly. They crave something more meaningful.

Consider some evidence Jonathan Fitzgerald's counter argument to Wampole:

"All across the pop culture spectrum, the emphasis on sincerity and authenticity that has arisen has made it un-ironically cool to care about spirituality, family, neighbors, the environment, and the country. And pollsters find this same trend in the up-and-coming generation from which Wampole culls her hipsters, Millennials. A recent Knights of Columbus-Marist Poll survey found that among Millennials, six out of 10 prioritized being close to God and having a good family life above anything else. For those in Generation X, family was still important, but the second priority was not spirituality—it was making a lot of money. Clearly, a change has been underway."

Now, do hipsters present themselves with a bit of irony? Absolutely. If you're going to twist your mustache into waxed handlebars then you're going to stand out from the dominant culture, and irony is a serviceable defense mechanism. But behind the irony stands a deeper ethic: sincerity.

And let us remember that sincerity doesn't automatically mean "good." Take the classic example from the 80's megahit Wall Street, in which Gordon Gekko tells us that greed is good. It's supposed to be a cautionary tale, but people adopted it as a mantra:



There's no irony to be found there! He's completely sincere. That slicked-back hair is the predatory embodiment of a shark's fins. Those power shoulders are meant to intimidate. 

I'll take hipster irony over yuppie sincerity any day, friends. 


* * *

Thanks to Greg Milner for linking to Wampole's essay. I found inspiration in a counter argument to that essay by Jonathan Fitzgerald. Read Mr. Fitzgerald's work here.

Saturday, March 21, 2015

The Hipster And The Stoic



There's a new coffee bar where I live called Archive. My wife and I enjoy coffee and we enjoy playing cards in coffee shops, so we walked in and sat down. It was fun. The proprietors have a real eye for detail.

For starters everything looks reclaimed. The walls seem hung with old beams from leather boot factories. There's a very interesting image on the far wall made out of thread wound around nails. I looked around before I poked it. Nice tension; quality craftsmanship.

Then there are the barristas, who look a lot like civil war veterans. Their beards are long and well kempt, and the whitewalled sides of their heads grow into slick-backed demi-pompadours. Jeans are made of selvage denim and cuffed. Footwear looks like something paratroopers strapped up before jumping over Normandy. Sleeves are rolled and suspenders bring it all together.

They're very friendly and they know what they're talking about when it comes to coffee. They view themselves as artisans, and the product justifies that view.

We enjoyed it.

Still, nagging at the back of my brain, a small voice kept saying "poseurs."

Why? Why did I feel a need to judge these very kind, sincere people?

One of the great benefits of Stoicism is that it cultivates an ability to separate oneself from one's thoughts and examine them from the outside. I think this is what Seneca means when he says:

"What progress have I made? I am beginning to be my own friend.’ That is progress indeed. Such a people will never be alone and you may be sure he is a friend to all."

First, I felt a little threatened. Hipsters often present as intellectuals. Sometimes it's a calculated pose, but in my experience it's often not. Often they really are people who read and think. They're into alternative lifestyles and alternative philosophies... What if they know something that I don't? What if they're smarter?

A number of them definitely are smarter. Isn't that good? Engaging in conversation with a smart person who knows something that I don't should be improving, not threatening. I have a feeling that a number of young Stoics I interact with online might fit into the hipster category. We're all reviving a nearly extinct philosophy, after all.  That's pretty fringe.

I find that these young Stoics really know their stuff. They're often not weighed down by family and career in the same way that I am. They have time to think. When I listen to them and offer them friendship we both benefit. When I refute them and offer sarcasm neither of us benefit.

So feeling threatened by hipsters is not a worthy thought. Moving on...

Second, I felt out of place. I didn't belong. I didn't dress like them, for starters. I keep a short beard and I wear those sort of 60's style glasses because those are about the only kind you can get anymore, but I was just wearing some old leather shoes, battered jeans and an old button up shirt... hang on...

There I am in a beard and horned rimmed glasses sipping fair-trade yirgacheffe coffee and playing cards with my wife on a reclaimed work bench while people talk about art and philosophy all around me...

Am I a hipster?

Does it matter? Maybe a good cup of coffee is just a good cup of coffee, and good conversation is just good conversation. Maybe choosing to think this way will make me more of a friend to all.


* * *

I release the above picture into the public domain, because that's the kind of guy I am. This one's for you, StoicBeCuz.

Seneca on Moving

"Judging by what you write me, and by what I hear, I am forming a good opinion regarding your future. You do not run hither and thither and distract yourself by changing your abode; for such restlessness is the sign of a disordered spirit. The primary indication, to my thinking, of a well-ordered mind is a man's ability to remain in one place and linger in his own company. Be careful, however, lest this reading of many authors and books of every sort may tend to make you discursive and unsteady. You must linger among a limited number of master-thinkers, and digest their works, if you would derive ideas which shall win firm hold in your mind. Everywhere means nowhere. When a person spends all his time in foreign travel, he ends by having many acquaintances, but no friends. And the same thing must hold true of men who seek intimate acquaintance with no single author, but visit them all in a hasty and hurried manner. Food does no good and is not assimilated into the body if it leaves the stomach as soon as it is eaten; nothing hinders a cure so much as frequent change of medicine; no wound will heal when one salve is tried after another; a plant which is often moved can never grow strong. There is nothing so efficacious that it can be helpful while it is being shifted about. And in reading of many books is distraction."

My perception of the Romans of Seneca's time and class is that they were liesured and constantly in search of novelty. They were trying to fill up their lives with new places, exotic food, and ALL the ideas.

Is that bad? I don't know, but I DO know that I live in such a time myself, and I live in something like such a class. I don't have servants and I do have a job, but there are similarities.

I haven't found flitting from place to place and food to food to be very satisfying, and allthough I enjoy jumping from book to book I find that when I take Seneca's advice and really study just one I get a lot more out of it. When I flit I barely remember any of it.

More on this at the dabbalism reddit...

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Be Your Own Friend



"What progress have I made? I am beginning to be my own friend.’ That is progress indeed. Such a people will never be alone and you may be sure he is a friend to all."

"Nothing, to my way of thinking, is a better proof of a well ordered mind than a man’s ability to stop just where he is and pass some time in his own company."

Seneca said this.

I've been thinking about it today because I read it in one of his letters last night. I think that as you consider your own thoughts from the outside, which is a Stoic skill, you maybe begin to see what Seneca meant.

My brain might think "She doesn't like me." Well, brain, not everyone is going to like you. Did you do anything you ought to regret in her presence? "No, I don't think so." Then it's on her to tell you if something is bothering her, and then it's on you to decide if that's valid. People have hangups, brain. Maybe you remind her of someone who hurt her, or maybe she's unhappy with the world and doesn't like most people... not your problem, though. "Gee, thanks, Stoic self." No problem. That's what I'm here for.

I actually have conversations like that with myself. I didn't used to. Must be Stoic. Or schizophrenic...


* * *

Image, modified by an original by Calidius, is public domain

Saturday, March 14, 2015

The Best Reply I've Ever Seen...

...on an internet forum....

Zotoaster said this on the Stoic Subreddit four days ago:

I used to imagine a future-version of myself.

That future-guy that I was imagining always had one thing in common. He wasn't thinking about the future. He was enjoying himself where/when he was, in his own time.

I guess I am older now, so in a sense, I have a duty to my past-self to live in the moment, otherwise, I will never become that future-self.

That, friends, is a full-blown Stoic maxim. Well done, Zotoaster.

Sunday, March 8, 2015

Preferred Indiferents: The Folding Blade Box Cutter



My grandfather gave me my first pocket knife. It was a massive Swiss Army knife with a Ford Model T on the side. I treasured that knife. I still have it and it's a very nice reminder of him, though my memories of him are far more precious (thanks, Stoicism!).

These days, for everyday use, I carry a folding blade box cutter. I got mine from Harbor Frieght for something like $5. I've had it for awhile and it still works great.

It has some advantages over a pocket knife:

1. The blade is always sharp (just replace it when it's not)
2. It's cheap, so if I lose it I don't much care (check out Musonius Rufus for more on this)
3. It does everything I would do with a pocket knife (I cut things and whittle the occaisional pencil)

The only disadvantage I've found thus far is that it isn't as useful as a pry bar. The blade tends to break.

* * *


I hereby release the above image into the public domain

Sunday, March 1, 2015

She's The Answer To All Your Problems

I-2012-0002247.img


No she's not. None of them are.

Somewhere I saw Russell Brand in an interview. He said something like "In this post Christian world we look for our savior in romantic love." I think there's something to that. I've known a lot of people who think that in the first rush of love they've found the answer to all their problems... in another person. They have found "the one."

Russell Brand will be disappointed. Anybody who thinks this way will be disappointed.

Now I'm not saying that "the one" doesn't exist. What I'm saying is that "the one" is built, not found, and "the one" is a companion, not a savior.

In a world of 7 billion people I'm positive that at least 1,000,000 of them are "perfect" for you. Any one of them will do. What happens is you find one, you build a life together, and now that person is The One. You can't replace your mutual history with somebody else, especially if you meet as young adults. It's precious beyond all money.

You go through a process of deep conversion, and so does the other person, until life is unimaginable without them. As Stoics we imagine it anyway, we imagine losing this person, and this prepares us for when it happens, but there is a deep sense of permanence built over time that cannot be denied.

Even then she (or he, depending on your preference) isn't the answer to all your problems, but she is a great source of comfort, stability and joy. There is a reason why only half of us get divorced. In these times of sexual openness half of us stay married anyway. Why is that? Because marriage, for a large number of people, is a good thing. We'd call it a preferred indifferent.

So how is such a relationship built? That is a vast topic, but for starters you work on you. You develop your character, your discipline, your mercy. Help yourself first and then you can help other people, but "helping" doesn't mean "get rich." Helping yourself means developing your virtue, at least for a Stoic. That's what Aurelius was doing in his Meditations. That's what Epictetus was doing with his teaching. Epictetus especially; he achieved mastery and then he helped the people around him. He's been dead for a couple thousand years and I've never paid him a dime, but he helps me every day.

So she isn't the answer. You are.

Listen to the lyrics of this very lovely song and see if you agree with them:




I don't. It's still a nice song, though.

EDIT:

I found this quote in an interview with Hozier, who I have to say is an extremely eloquent young man. I look forward to listening to more of his work:

"Take Me to Church" is essentially about sex, but it's a tongue-in-cheek attack at organizations that would … well, it's about sex and it's about humanity, and obviously sex and humanity are incredibly tied. Sexuality, and sexual orientation — regardless of orientation — is just natural. An act of sex is one of the most human things. But an organization like the church, say, through its doctrine, would undermine humanity by successfully teaching shame about sexual orientation — that it is sinful, or that it offends God. The song is about asserting yourself and reclaiming your humanity through an act of love. Turning your back on the theoretical thing, something that's not tangible, and choosing to worship or love something that is tangible and real — something that can be experienced.

"But it's not an attack on faith. Coming from Ireland, obviously, there's a bit of a cultural hangover from the influence of the church. You've got a lot of people walking around with a heavy weight in their hearts and a disappointment, and that shit carries from generation to generation. So the song is just about that — it's an assertion of self, reclaiming humanity back for something that is the most natural and worthwhile. Electing, in this case a female, to choose a love who is worth loving."

So he views the replacement of a holy savior with his girlfriend as a "tongue-in-cheek" attack on organizations. He's not literally worshipping her. For him this song is far more about the Church than it is about a lover. That bit about worshiping or loving "something that is tangible and real" is problematic for me, but I don't think I gave the man enough credit.

So there you go!


* * *

Public domain image courtesy of the completely absorbing Public Domain Review

Do We Have Souls?



Do we have souls?

For me, whether it's true or not I have a sense of my own soul and I have a sense of a Divine presence. Maybe it's an evolutionary trick; some psychologists who investigate this stuff say that many of us believe in a separate soul because our minds cannot comprehend non-existence.

On the other hand maybe there's something to it... Michio Kaku, one of the founders of String Theory, is comfortable with a "non-personal" God, and if that God exists Its mind is made of cosmic strings. The strings vibrate in a cosmic symphony and they play out existence. It almost sounds like a Greek myth.

And time isn't linear, right? It folds around itself. In that sense we are immortal, whatever that means.

Or we're not. So to paraphrase Aurelius very liberally and probably badly...

What is it to us if there are no gods? Will we do anything differently? But there are gods, and they have given us all the tools we need to become more like them. That's my own interpretation of what he says, anyway, or rather that is the sense I get from it. Here is the actual quote:


"Now departure from the world of men is nothing to fear, if gods exist: because they would not involve you in any harm. If they do not exist, or if they have no care for humankind, then what is life to me in a world devoid of gods, or devoid of providence? But they do exist, and they do care for humankind: and they have put it absolutely in man's power to avoid falling into the true kinds of harm."

Does my belief in Divinity and the soul motivate me to do anything evil? I don't think so. I would say the opposite; we are taught as Stoics that our fellow humans are pieces of a Divine whole. They are our brothers and sisters in that sense. We are to love them and be patient with them, and when they do bad they do it because they are ignorant of the good. This applies to me as well. When I do bad it is because I am ignorant of the good. Other people ARE us and we ARE them. I find that meditating on the Divine helps me to put my thoughts about this into practice. It makes me more forgiving and understanding.



* * *

Image, "Dying Bacchante," courtesy of the New York Public Library, is public domain